that is a hurry transcript from "Fox news Sunday,"
December four, 2016. This replica won't be in its very last form and can be up
to date.
CHRIS WALLACE, FOX news ANCHOR: I’m Chris Wallace.
President-opt for Trump takes a victory lap and previews
what's in shop whilst he takes the oath of workplace subsequent month.
(begin VIDEOTAPE)
DONALD TRUMP, R-PRESIDENT-pick: I’m going to speak about our movement plan to
make america
top notch again.
WALLACE: And Trump is
already acting, intervening to keep jobs within the U.S.
and naming a retired marine fashionable to steer the Pentagon.
TRUMP: we're going to
employ "Mad canine" Mattis as our secretary of protection.
WALLACE: Then,
insults fly when pinnacle officials from the Clinton
and Trump campaigns meet at a Harvard forum.
JENNIFER PALMIERI, CLINTON COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR: i might alternatively lose than win the way
you guys did.
KELLYANNE CONWAY, DONALD TRUMP campaign supervisor: No, you would not.
PALMIERI: sure. sure.
yes.
WALLACE: we'll get
the cutting-edge on that and the Trump transition live from pinnacle adviser Kellyanne
Conway.
Then, inexperienced party presidential nominee Jill Stein,
who is pushing for recounts in three states Donald Trump received
narrowly.
it is a "Fox information Sunday" distinctive.
Plus, we'll ask our Sunday panel what Democrats need to do
now after their contributors within the house re-go with Nancy Pelosi as their
leader.
And our energy play of the week. Veterans education service dogs and recovery
themselves.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: A
human/animal bond has worked higher than every other intervention that I’m
aware about.
WALLACE: All, proper
now, on "Fox information Sunday."
(give up VIDEOTAPE)
WALLACE: And howdy
again from Fox news in Washington.
This week, Donald Trump validated for any doubters
nonetheless available simply how unconventional a president he will be. Intervening immediately to keep one thousand
jobs from going to Mexico,
preserving a campaign-fashion rally, wherein he endured to bash the media, and
protecting conversations with foreign leaders that break with decades of U.S.
international relations.
joining me now from Trump transition headquarters in ny,
Kellyanne Conway, considered one of Mr. Trump's pinnacle advisers.
And, Kellyanne, welcome back to "Fox news Sunday."
CONWAY: thank you for having me, Chris.
WALLACE: let's begin
with the debate over the call that Mr. Trump took this week from Taiwan's
president, President Tsai. the primary
time leaders of our two international locations have, to the best of our
expertise, spoken because the U.S.
broke off members of the family in 1979.
Now, you are saying that Mr. Trump was absolutely briefed, knew what he
changed into doing earlier than this name, which increases the query, does he
intend to change a One China policy, which acknowledges only Beijing?
CONWAY: nicely, President-opt for Trump is well aware
of our One China policy. He well-known a
congratulatory call from the president of Taiwan. That marks probable the 40th or fiftieth
world leader that has reached out to the president-decide on or the vice
chairman-choose Mike Pence on account that they won the election remaining
month, Chris. they have talked to the prime ministers or presidents of Israel,
Singapore, of Japan,
of China. glaringly --
WALLACE: however this
one's exceptional. The question, I
guess, is, does this signal a alternate in policy, or turned into it only a
smartphone name?
CONWAY: It became just a telephone call at this
factor. It alerts the reality that he
ordinary a congratulatory name. I
recognise that China
has a perspective on it. The White house
and country branch likely have a attitude on it. without a doubt, Taiwan
has a angle on it.
however the president-pick's perspective is that he everyday
a congratulatory name. whilst he is
sworn in as president and commander-in-leader in a touch over a month, Chris,
he's going to make clean the fullness of his plans. but human beings shouldn't read too much into
it. and that i -- a number of the
clicking insurance, not here necessarily, is absolutely brilliant when you
reflect onconsideration on the way it become protected while Barack Obama was
going to try to reach out to Iran and give you an Iran nuclear deal.
This guy obtained -- the president-pick obtained a phone
call from a global leader out of the country.
We understand about one-China. He
is aware of about one-China. he's
mechanically briefed on those topics.
That just is what it's miles.
WALLACE: So, let me
ask you approximately this, and i assume one of the reasons this type of big
deal become manufactured from it's miles due to the fact that the
president-decide on has had a number of arguable cellphone calls with overseas
leaders. He reportedly advised Pakistani
high Minister Sharif he might, quote, play any function you need me to play to
address and discover solutions to the u . s .'s troubles, no matter Pakistan’s
relationship with terrorists. He also
spoke with Philippine President Duterte, who is been accused of ordering the
murder of lots of suspected drug dealers -- which raises the query, Kellyanne,
why is Mr. Trump refusing the nation branch's provide to quick him earlier than
these calls, and why is he skipping the daily briefings, intelligence
briefings, that President Obama receives each day?
CONWAY: he is not usually skipping those
briefings. he is briefed by means of any
range of credible sources on those issues.
I assume human beings, Chris, frankly, are cherry selecting about these
international leaders. they're accusing
the president-choose of somehow countenancing some of those behaviors in those
different places.
but, look, it's genuinely unfair whilst you reflect
onconsideration on we just had an election and the opponent, Hillary Clinton,
who turned into the secretary of nation, turned into the use of the state
department to get cash from foreign governments like Saudi
Arabia, which doesn't even appreciate girls
and girls.
So, it’s -- I suppose human beings just have their hair on
hearth, in particular folks who are nevertheless entrenched inside the
campaign, are looking to reverse the election outcomes from ultimate week. allow's provide this man time to form his
cupboard. he is also displaying respect
to the contemporary president, President Obama, who is still the president for
approximately 6 half of more weeks and the commander in leader, virtually.
he is now not obtainable -- President-pick Trump isn't out
there making policy or pronouncing new policy prescriptions international. he is simply taking cellphone calls. he will, I’m sure, reengage with a lot of
those global leaders once he's taking the oath of office.
WALLACE: Kellyanne,
speakme of humans with hair on hearth, final week, you went on numerous of the
alternative Sunday talk indicates to express the priority of Trump supporters
about the attention of Mitt Romney as secretary of country.
here's a clip.
(begin VIDEO CLIP)
CONWAY: I’m hearing
from people announcing, good day, my dad and mom died penniless, however I gave
$216 to Donald Trump's marketing campaign, and i'd sense betrayed.
(stop VIDEO CLIP)
WALLACE: I recognize
which you say Mr. Trump gave you permission, but there is a larger question,
that is, is that a right manner to treat anyone who is speakme about accepting
a function in public service?
CONWAY: nicely, first, the president-pick has stated
he gave me permission. he is quoted in
"The big apple times" and some other place saying that, and that's
absolutely genuine. i would no longer
say some thing publicly that I hadn't expressed privately. And i would never purposely embarrass
him. He has my recognize and my duty,
frankly, my service. So --
WALLACE: I’m now not
speaking approximately Mr. Trump. I’m
talking approximately Mr. Romney. Is
that the precise manner to treat a guy who is simply discussing public
provider, to mention people are going to sense betrayed?
CONWAY: nicely, to begin with, I’m reflecting the
information, not seeking to make the news.
i used to be astonished, Chris, that during a week when President-pick
Trump told "The the big apple instances" at the document he would
relook at waterboarding, he might relook on the Paris accords on weather
alternate, he was not particularly interested by specializing in prosecuting
Hillary Clinton any similarly due to the fact he changed into focused on
fitness care and immigration. He
understands that different corporations and individuals are charged with that
obligation.
but in per week whilst he stated that, the breathtaking
backlash become clearly about this unique prospective cabinet member. i'd turn the query around and ask, become it
appropriate for Governor Romney to stick his neck out thus far in attacking
Donald Trump? And never on foot it
returned, by no means encouraging people to support the nominee once Mr. Trump
had received the nomination squarely and fairly.
So, I’ve spoken my piece on that. And, without a doubt, the president-go with
knows and i said publicly and could say right here once more, some thing he
chooses and whomever he chooses has my complete help and backing.
WALLACE: however let
me simply --
CONWAY: He is aware of that.
WALLACE: allow me
simply quickly observe up on that.
certainly, Romney is beneath attention.
We just confirmed a picture of them having dinner on Tuesday night
time. If Mr. Trump choices Romney, what
are you going to mention to those Trump supporters who are going to sense
betrayed?
CONWAY: I’m going to
say to the ones Trump supporters what I say to folks that did no longer vote
for the new president-go with, Chris, a number of whom appear to have a tough
time accepting the fact he is their president.
I’m going to mention you need to paintings together. you have to take delivery of his
judgment. And the man is excellent.
the man is the exceptional negotiator. he is the best connector and
communicator. manifestly, he just pulled
off the dissatisfied of the century, possibly.
And the fact is, you have to accept as true with his
instincts and his judgment because it’s what delivered such a lot of people
alongside to his movement within the first area. And it's truly what inspires me every day to
paintings with him.
So, we -- everyone, I suppose i hope, will receive
that. And the president-elect and the
president-elect on my own will make the selection as to whom he have to have
serving him at the highest stages of government.
WALLACE: allow’s talk
approximately Mr. Trump's instincts because he went to Indiana this week to
celebrate after his intervention the truth that carrier goes to hold one
thousand jobs within the kingdom. here
he's.
(start VIDEO CLIP)
TRUMP: pay attention,
organizations aren't going to go away the usa
anymore without results. now not going
to happen. it is now not going to
occur.
(quit VIDEO CLIP)
WALLACE: however in
an editorial Friday with the headline "Trump's carrier shakedown,"
The Wall avenue journal said the united states
may not end up more wealthy by way of forcing corporations to make noneconomic
investments. A country gets rich when
people and agencies are allowed to take dangers as they see suit in a
aggressive financial system.
Kellyanne, I do not have to inform you, it really is the
conservative view of the way a unfastened market works and that politicians
shouldn't be picking winners and losers. Sarah Palin calls this an example of
crony capitalism.
CONWAY: nicely,
the president-choose just really disagrees.
in case you look at what passed off, that is what leaders do. certainly what people who've been wildly a
success in constructing agencies across the globe as the president-opt for has
been.
You produce. You
deliver. You attain outcomes. each person appears on the result right here,
which is about 1,a hundred workers are going to live in Indiana. His going for walks mate, the vice chairman-select,
is the governor of Indiana. and i assume together, they labored with
service.
every person is calling at it as a stick, there are
carrots. There are incentives right
here. They labored with carrier to find
a manner together, to maintain those jobs right here and not to visit Mexico.
it's marvelous to see this appear. The current president may want to have
accomplished it. He never did it. The president-pick did it before he is sworn
in.
And permit me just say this, $7 million in incentives, they
carry over ten years. So, about $700,000
consistent with year in incentives is a part of this deal. it really is approximately $785, maybe $800
in line with worker. So, humans should
positioned this in angle earlier than they act like it is some sort of
big-footed intervention.
This guy ran from day one on bringing returned jobs from China,
Mexico, and
some other place. And he is already
delivered.
WALLACE: I need to
get into more subjects with you. One, Harvard's Institute
of Politics holds a forum every
four years wherein representatives of the prevailing and dropping campaigns get
collectively and attempt to have a kind of instructional review of what befell,
on why one side won, one facet.
well, it wasn’t that way this year. It were given pretty unpleasant. And here are some of the exchanges among you
and Clinton communications director
Jennifer Palmieri. here they are.
(start AUDIO CLIP)
CONWAY: Do you think I ran a campaign wherein white
supremacists had a platform? Are you
going to appearance me within the face and tell me that?
JENNIFER PALMIERI, CLINTON COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR: It did.
It truely did. it is providing a
platform for white supremacists. If it
makes me a first-rate tactician, I’m glad to have lost.
i might instead lose than win the way you did.
CONWAY: No, you wouldn't.
PALMIERI: sure.
CONWAY: No, you wouldn’t.
PALMIERI: sure,
yes.
CONWAY: this is very clear today. No, you wouldn't, respectfully.
(quit AUDIO CLIP)
WALLACE: What did you
put off from that?
CONWAY: properly, the relaxation of the exchange
become me telling her and her team as politely as I may want to that you
neglected the us. You all you needed to
do is identified that a whole lot of voters had a difficult time accepting
Hillary Clinton as this outsider disrupter who changed into ethically smooth
and might treat all people fairly, had run an aspirational, uplifting campaign
that had an monetary message for lots of operating america.
The concept that --
what, they are able to say what they want about me and my group. we've got very extensive shoulders over right
here, as you could consider.
but to besmirch over 60 million hardworking women and men on
this u . s . a . who became a part of the Trump movement, to fake that Donald
Trump was not available every unmarried day, Chris, now and again four, 5,
seven stops in a single day, bringing his case immediately to the yankee people
and announcing what to them, that we are going to reform the Veterans
management, which leaves veterans to die.
That we're going to stand with the aid of regulation enforcement and the
skinny blue line. that he is going to
create 25 million jobs over 5 years, have an infrastructure program, repeal and
update Obamacare, which has sincerely reduced the first-class, and the
selection, and the get entry to and increase the rate of healthcare for plenty
americans, left others in the back of.
that he is going to defeat radical Islamic terrorism inside the face of
Hillary Clinton regarding them as our determined enemies and President Obama
saying they may be the jayvee team it really is been brushed lower back. no person believes that.
And so, to besmirch the ones voters is truely past the pale
to me. and that i had already -- that
became a 2 half of hour discussion board and also you’re gambling multiple
clips. I had already credited them as
fantastic strategists, as people I reputable specialists. That became all accomplished.
however there was no grace, there was no congratulations for
them. And, frankly, there may be no
self-attention that they misplaced the election because they missed the
us. They blamed Bernie Sanders. They blamed Jim Comey.
it's usual of Hillary Clinton. In Hillary Clinton's international, it's
always somebody else's fault.
WALLACE: All
proper. One closing thing -- I’m happy
to peer this was such an educational dialogue.
sooner or later, we're going to, in a couple moments, have
Jill Stein at the software, the inexperienced birthday celebration presidential
nominee who is pushing recounts in Wisconsin,
in Michigan, and Pennsylvania. What do you assert to her approximately the
ones efforts?
CONWAY: I say to her, give it up, as it seems like
you’re doing in Pennsylvania for
a completely simple motive. Even your
pals in the Clinton campaign have
admitted that those recounts will now not trade any outcomes. Hillary Clinton won a whopping one vote,
Chris, one. And so, I read one article
at "The every day Caller" I agree with that stated at this tempo,
Hillary Clinton should exchange the election effects in Wisconsin
in 74 1/2 years.
I don't think the usa
is going to sit round and look forward to that to occur. The humans have spoken. i used to be asked in this application and
lots of others as a way to you receive the election results. The question for Jill Stein and Hillary
Clinton and those nevertheless inside the grief, anger, and denial stages, will
you begin transferring over to recognition and permit this president-choose and
vice chairman-choose get on with the enterprise of presidency, have a non
violent switch of strength?
the opposite thing is, I’m simply astonished how Jill Stein
is now the favourite taste of the left.
They omitted her and ridiculed her.
And a number of their buddies in the media made sure she had no coverage
and no oxygen.
WALLACE: nicely, I’ve
were given to cut you off so we can get her on the show.
CONWAY: go ahead.
WALLACE: ok.
CONWAY: want her properly for me. but, yes, I mean, gracious -- it's top to be
gracious and to admit what you spot in front of you. In this case, Donald Trump gained 306
electoral votes, 30 of fifty states, 2,six hundred counties.
WALLACE: good enough.
CONWAY: It wasn't even close.
WALLACE: Kellyanne,
thanks. thanks in your time
nowadays.
CONWAY: thank you, Chris.
WALLACE: Up
subsequent, we will convey in our Sunday institution to talk about Donald Trump
now not waiting till he is sworn in to start appearing like the president.
Plus, what would you want it ask the panel approximately
Trump's cope with carrier to hold one thousand jobs here? simply go to facebook or Twitter
@FoxNewsSunday. We may additionally use
your query on the air.
(business smash)
(start VIDEO CLIP)
TRUMP: they are
saying it’s no longer presidential to name up those big leaders of commercial
enterprise. however I think it is very
presidential. And if it's not
presidential, this is adequate. this is
adequate, because I definitely like doing it.
(give up VIDEO CLIP)
WALLACE: Donald Trump
talking at provider plant in Indianapolis
this week after operating out a deal to preserve 1000 jobs there from moving to
Mexico. And it's time now for our Sunday group.
Monica Crowley, editor and columnist for "The
Washington times", Fox information political analyst, Juan Williams, Lisa
Lerer, who covers politics for "The associated Press, and from The Wall
street magazine, Kimberley Strassel.
properly, Kim, you're a member of that Wall road magazine
editorial board that wrote that editorial that we simply talked to Kellyanne
Conway approximately, the carrier shakedown.
What approximately the argument that, appearance, this was a powerful,
symbolic message that President Trump goes to have American employees' backs,
and when he receives into workplace in a month, that then he can start
macroeconomic modifications like slicing tax and rolling back policies?
KIMBERLEY STRASSEL, THE WALL road magazine: I agree with all of that. Politically, this was very, very smart. It become a campaign promise he made, and he
fulfilled it.
I’m just pronouncing economically, this isn't surely the
manner you need to run an economic system.
We just had a president who for 8 years determined they had been going
to politically allocate capital within the country, choose winners and
losers. We have been very vital of him
for doing that, Solyndra et al.
this is a similar model of this. those organizations are not leaving america
due to the fact they may be anti-American or want to stick it to Indiana. they are following the legal guidelines of
economics. it is too pricey to do
enterprise right here.
So, Mr. Trump has a desire.
He can go from business enterprise to business enterprise, heaps of
them, and type of beat they all into submission and threaten them with price
lists, or recognition -- and that i suppose this is what he's going to do -- on
macroeconomic coverage, like slicing tax and cutting again regulation.
WALLACE: however he's
also talking approximately tariffs and punitive tax. I imply, that’s part of -- in truth, we have
to say he is on a Twitter storm this morning.
he's speaking about that.
STRASSEL: in case
you're going to talk approximately the long-term financial system and the way
you preserve businesses here, I suppose there may be a actual hazard that if
you start doing that and saying that human beings are not going to build their
businesses in the u.s. inside the first place due to the fact they will be too
involved what about they should do if they need to depart. And so, that is just -- this is something
governors do. The president of america
has got extra assets to do bigger guidelines.
WALLACE: I need to
play another clip from Mr. Trump's speech at that Cincinnati
rally on Thursday night time. here it's
far.
(begin VIDEO CLIP)
TRUMP: The technology
of financial give up is over. we're
going to fight for every ultimate American activity. it is time to get rid of the rust from the
Rust Belt and bring in a brand new business Revolution. we're going to do it.
(end VIDEO CLIP)
WALLACE: We ask you
for questions for the panel. We were
given this on Twitter from someone named Steelers Slob. "For taxpayers, is
it higher for the government to assist groups, or is it higher for the loose
marketplace to weed out the weak?"
Lisa, we need to factor out all this took place on the equal
week that the unemployment fee hit a nine-year low of 4.6 percent. however how do you solution Steelers
Slob?
LISA LERER, related PRESS:
nicely, I suppose a whole lot of human beings --
WALLACE: and i need
you to use his name in answering.
(LAUGHTER)
LERER: nicely,
Steelers Slob, I think a variety of human beings in Washington
might choose the latter, would say the loose marketplace. you spot that within the reaction to this
carrier deal. It wasn't simply The Wall
avenue journal editorial board that took trouble with it. So did Bernie Sanders. So did Larry Summers. So did Sarah Palin.
So, I suppose what we are seeing, , what Washington
can put off from this choice by Mr. Trump is that this is a new emblem of
politics. this is going to be Trumpism,
no longer Republicanism, no longer Democraticism, however Trumpism. And so, I suppose it's actually sending a
touch little bit of a kick back and a touch bit of a sense of foreboding as
much as Capitol Hill. these humans do
not pretty recognize what they can assume other than something pretty
unpredictable.
WALLACE: Monica, I
want to show to another difficulty I mentioned with Kellyanne. That become President-decide on Trump's
cellphone calls with foreign leaders, specially with the president of Taiwan.
You heard the query I asked her. ought to he be higher briefed? ought to he be accepting nation department
briefings? have to he be taking the
presidential each day short that maximum president-elects usually get every day
and Mike Pence is apparently getting every day?
ought to he be getting all the briefings he can earlier than he steps
into this international of diplomatic nuance?
MONICA CROWLEY, THE WASHINGTON times: properly, the president-select is getting
ordinary briefings from humans he trusts, professionals like fashionable Flynn,
who will be the income country wide safety adviser. he is fairly nicely briefed earlier than he
is taking these phone calls. The
smartphone call on the time when he’s president turned into a congratulatory
telephone call. My information, it was
simplest about ten mins. They discussed
a number issues.
however I suppose Donald Trump became elected not strengthen
the reputation quo but to shake up the reputation quo, to venture the
conventional methods of doing things.
This conversation -- look, Donald Trump understands One
China policy very well. There might be
lots of time to discuss the whole variety of problems concerning China
and the Pacific Rim as soon as he is sworn in. however he additionally is familiar with it's
critical for the president-opt for and then the president of america
to face for freedom and to stands with those who challenge folks who could
oppress them. And that consists of the
chinese government.
So, I don't know what his coverage might be in regards to China
as soon as he is president of the us.
What I do know is he felt he was exceedingly critical to send a signal
that, sure, he will take a whole new observe the variety of problems.
WALLACE: So, Juan,
are you persuaded with the aid of Monica, or -- I suggest, is the media making
too massive a deal of these smartphone calls?
JUAN WILLIAMS, FOX news POLITICAL ANALYST: No.
however permit me just say, I assume to his supporters, there may be no
longer an awful lot Donald Trump can do at this factor that would motive them
some offense. I imply, the idea is that
we shouldn't take him literally, that he is appearing on a symbolic level,
whether or not it's with provider or with the smartphone calls.
The hassle is that during terms of the journalism, the
country wide protection network, the diplomatic network right here in Washington
is alarmed via this. we've a One China
policy that’s been in vicinity because Richard Nixon, to all at once cross
outside of that.
You noted now not taking the each day briefings, but it is
also not been consulting with the country, for example, the state department
about how do I prepare to talk if I’m figuring out I need to do that and that i
want to alternate the coverage. How do I
talk to this character in an powerful manner?
we've already seen China record a proper grievance about the
call. So, honestly, it is had an effect
there even supposing i was to sit down right here and say to you, no big
deal. It’s having an effect in phrases
of global relationships.
And going forward, there are questions on, nicely, what
approximately his enterprise dealings?
As you understand, it got here up this week. So, you've got ethics human beings here in Washington,
well, he should make sure that he's completely divested. Trump has now not agreed to that. while he is assembly with high Minister Abe
of Japan and
brings in his daughter, whilst he's speaking to the British about windmills
near his golf guides, people are like, what is going on here?
STRASSEL: nicely, I
think this uproar is completely overwrought.
I mean, numerous this is being driven by way of kingdom branch functionaries
who are very unhappy that Donald Trump is not coming to them. And they may be no longer being allowed to
formulate all American regulations.
through the manner, that become what he turned into elected to do, to a
sure volume.
and that i think the alternative point is that you obtain to
have a look at what Donald Trump says and also what he does. To me, the some distance extra vital message
that were given sent this week to the arena was the appointment and the naming
of Mad canine Mattis as secretary of defense.
Now, if i used to be Pyongyang or Tehran, that's what I’d be listening
to, because that is a totally clean-eyed standard who is familiar with global
politics thoroughly and goes to be plenty tougher than this cutting-edge
administration.
WALLACE: All
proper. earlier than we stop this
section, Lisa, I need to get to you. You
have been at this discussion board at Harvard about rehashing the marketing
campaign. How unpleasant did it
get?
LERER: It were given pretty ugly. I suppose it is crucial to speak
approximately what this normally is.
this is normally a very state affair in which they sip espresso and eat
canapes as they talk their approach --
WALLACE: Canapes,
that’s top right there.
(LAUGHTER)
LERER: As they talk
their strategy for the ancient record.
it really is not what this was. This felt almost like a collective
apprehensive breakdown. It wasn't simply
ugliness among the 2 campaigns, who simply have been reduced to shouting on
severa activities on every other.
Republican marketing campaign managers heckled CNN president Jeff
Zucker. Pollster Nate Silver came in for
some heckling.
So, there has been a number of tension there. I think it genuinely shows how uncooked these
divides nonetheless are and it definitely sends a little little bit of a
foreboding sign for our politics going forward.
It doesn't experience like there’s going to be an lousy lot of kumbaya
moments in our future. however perhaps
we're going to be pleasantly amazed.
WALLACE: Thirty
seconds, Monica. Are you amazed that the
Clinton camp remains so sour?
CROWLEY: they may be extremely sour. i was speakme to a few people on the Trump
transition, individuals who served on the marketing campaign. I think they are surprised it stays so
uncooked. The assignment for a
President-go with Donald Trump -- and this become considered one of his center
messages all through the campaign -- is that he become going to try and unify
the country, deliver everybody collectively.
I think the one way -- the most effective way for him to do
that is create a booming economy. If the
economy is roaring, as a way to in all likelihood silence quite a few his
critics.
WALLACE: All right,
panel. We need to take a smash
here.
when we come lower back, President-elect Trump's allies go
to courtroom to block recounts in three states.
we will talk to green birthday celebration presidential nominee, Dr.
Jill Stein, who is pushing the recount effort, subsequent.
(business spoil)
WALLACE: developing,
inexperienced birthday party presidential nominee Jill Stein defends her
attempt to get recounts in three key states.
(begin VIDEO CLIP)
DR. JILL STEIN, FMR. green celebration PRESIDENTIAL
NOMINEE: we are no longer doing this to
assist one candidate or hurt any other, but as an alternative to assist
electorate repair their confidence.
(give up VIDEO CLIP)
WALLACE: Jill Stein
in what she hopes to perform, subsequent.
handiest on "Fox news Sunday".
(industrial break)
WALLACE: a glance outdoor the beltway at Des
Moines, Iowa, where
President-go with Trump is ready to take his thanks tour next Thursday.
properly, the election cycle that appeared like it might by
no means end technically nevertheless hasn't. A recount is presently underway
in Wisconsin, with additional
challenges in Michigan and Pennsylvania.
joining us now to discuss her push for the recounts is inexperienced
celebration presidential nominee Dr. Jill Stein.
Dr. Stein, you say that your aim right here is not to change
the results of the election, but to make certain the accuracy of the count
number. My query is, why then did you select 3 states that Mr. Trump received
narrowly but now not a nation that Secretary Clinton received a great deal more
narrowly, New Hampshire, which she won via most effective three,000 votes?
STEIN: We did not go into New
Hampshire in particular because the cut-off date for
filing a recount had passed. but, in fact, at the time that we launched the
recount, two of the states had gone to Donald Trump. Michigan
was still uncertain as to which course it might cross. And as far as I’m
worried, if we do locate proof that there is a systemic problem right here with
those machines, which might be extremely unreliable, vulnerable to errors, and
-- and human blunders and gadget mistakes, in addition to to hacking and
security breaches, if we find evidence that there's a systemic hassle, we need
to make bigger the recount, in my opinion. that's what the yank electorate are
calling for, an election result and a balloting system that we can believe in.
WALLACE: allow me ask
-- let me ask you a query, Dr. Stein. Do you realize the most important switch
of votes in a recount in American political records?
STEIN: well, i will tell you one, for instance, in Toledo,
in 2004, there have been ninety,000 votes that have been marked clean, which
were located virtually no longer to be clean at all. and people -- while the --
when a hand recount became carried out. that could were enough to have changed
the outcome in Ohio. alas, that
wasn't found till after the election changed into already referred to as.
WALLACE: however --
however permit me inform you the -- the -- the -- the biggest actual transfer
of votes in any election in U.S. records was lower back in 2000 when more or
less 1,200 votes had been switched from Bush to Gore. we are speakme about 3
states, Michigan, Pennsylvania,
and Wisconsin, that Donald Trump
gained by using extra than 10,000 votes. So there may be now not a hazard in
the world here, Dr. Stein, that the -- that the vote exchange is going to --
that the vote is going to change in the ones three states.
STEIN: definitely -- simply, in Michigan
-- Chris, sincerely, in Michigan,
there are 75,000 votes which can be clean, which might be sky excessive as
compared to all different past elections. they are concentrated in Detroit.
it really is seventy five,000 votes which may additionally thoroughly be gadget
mistakes or human error. that is approximately seven instances the margin of
difference in Michigan. So those
results may want to, in reality, alternate the outcome, however we don't know
that till we clearly take a look at the proof. meaning a hand recount of the
ballots. this is going ahead in Wisconsin
--
WALLACE: however it’s
by no means -- it’s never passed off. there may be in no way been a 70,000-vote
transfer. The most there's ever been is 1,247.
let me ask you --
STEIN: That -- this is genuinely not proper. If the recounts
were achieved in time, they could affect ninety,000. And, in fact, in Detroit,
there ought to thoroughly be seventy five,000.
WALLACE: I’m -- I’m
asking -- I’m talking approximately -- look, I’m speaking, Dr. Stein, about
recounts that simply happened, now not ones that could have happened.
STEIN: it really is because we don't -- that’s due to the
fact we don’t do them. And, in truth, we ought to do them. it is how we ensure
that we have a system we are able to accept as true with. And proper now, as
you already know, Chris --
WALLACE: permit --
allow me ask you, Dr. Stein --
STEIN: Cynicism and distrust is running wild. We need to
cope with the fundamental concerns that the yankee electorate are expressing.
WALLACE: Dr. Stein,
allow's communicate about what numerous humans think is the actual factor here,
and this is, permit’s check how tons cash you raised to your presidential runs.
In 2012 you raised $893,000 on your presidential campaign. In 2016, $three.five
million. however for this recount, you've raised greater than $6.5 million from
nearly one hundred forty,000 donors. isn't always that what that is actually
approximately, Dr. Stein, the use of the recount it improve masses of money and
construct your listing of supporters?
STEIN: permit me be very clean, this money is going strictly
into a segregated account which could only be spent on the recount. So this --
this cash is totally -- might be completely used, and we're going to be lucky
if we can cowl the fee at the fee that there may be a bait and switch occurring
right here. In Wisconsin, we
simply noticed this price triple. So, to my mind, it’s -- it truely underscores
why we need a fundamentally at ease balloting device that has built-in
safeguards that have to have automated audits, recounts. We need to dispose of
those balloting machines, those digital contact monitors that have been
validated rather susceptible to tampering, to hacking, to human and device
errors. this is an -- that is an abuse of the yank vote.
WALLACE: So -- so the
fact that you have 140,000 donors is purely coincidental, Dr. Stein?
STEIN: well, placed it this manner, the yank human beings
have made it very clean what they want completed here. Chris, coming out of
this election, eighty percent of americans --
WALLACE: I -- wait,
wait, wait, I don’t assume the yankee humans --
STEIN: 80 percentage.
WALLACE: Wait, in
which do you -- wherein do you get off announcing the yankee humans --
STEIN: eighty percent of americans said they have been
disgusted.
WALLACE: wherein do
you get off pronouncing that the yank people are calling for this? I assume the
big majority of the american people assume we must take delivery of the end
result of the election.
STEIN: eighty percentage of americans said that they were
disgusted with this election --
WALLACE: I don’t
think that became -- I don’t -- it may had been the selection they'd. I don’t
assume it turned into the device that the -- or a call for for a recount.
STEIN: And we recognize that approximately 90 percentage of usa
citizens do not trust. this is a time that human beings do not have confidence
-- this is a time that humans have an entire loss of faith in our political
establishments. The way that the cash is coming in from small donors makes it
very clear. And, in fact, ballot . A ballot
just closing week showed the yankee people assist the recount and they
sense that if Donald Trump was inside the reverse role, he could be doing
precisely the equal component. don't forget, he said that it become a rigged
device and that he was not going to accept the result.
WALLACE: You’ve -- I
mean that --
STEIN: So he has articulated what many americans feel. it is
time to appreciate the perspectives of the american voter and make certain that
we have a balloting machine that we will accept as true with.
WALLACE: nicely, some
could say that the perspectives of the yank voter had been that Donald Trump
became elected president. you've now determined to --
STEIN: properly, don't forget what the electorate stated by
means of the Electoral college, now not by using the country wide popular vote.
WALLACE: If -- if I
may additionally ask my -- if I may additionally ask my query -- if I may also
ask my query, Dr. Stein, you've got now determined to visit the federal court
to try to get a recount in Pennsylvania after the state court said which you
could have to post, or your supporters could ought to publish a
million-greenback bond and also you said they can't have enough money that.
you'll keep a news convention the next day in front of Trump
Tower. what is he got to do with
it?
STEIN: We need to maintain this convention where the us will
see that we are standing up for ordinary people who do no longer have faith in
this election machine, who've lost self belief honestly in our political
system. And we're status up loud and strong to say that we are able to now not
be intimidated, we are able to now not be apprehensive by having to leap
through these kinds of prison hoops. we are saying, what is Donald Trump
terrified of because he's obstructing --
WALLACE: nicely, wait
-- wait --
STEIN: he's delaying those cases wherein the selections have
already --
WALLACE: He got -- he
were given -- what number of votes did you get in -- Dr. Stein, how many votes
did you get on this election?
STEIN: Excuse me -- excuse me, what number of votes did Donald
Trump get? He got approximately 2.five million much less votes --
WALLACE: He got -- he
were given sixty two.five -- he got 62.5 million votes.
STEIN: He were given about 2.5 million less votes than
Hillary Clinton.
WALLACE: He were
given 62.five million votes. what number of votes did you get, Dr. Stein?
STEIN: So I suppose the american human beings are owed an
actual explanation here --
WALLACE: Dr. --
STEIN: Of what goes on.
WALLACE: Dr. Stein,
could you answer the query?
STEIN: and you do not know until you study the proof.
WALLACE: how many --
how many votes did you get?
STEIN: i'm not the -- i'm not going to be the beneficiary of
this one manner or the other. it really is why i will try this due to the fact
I’m a non-partisan in this combat.
WALLACE: however he
got 62.5 million votes. what number of did you get? I imply the question
honestly is, who's speaking for American citizens, him or you?
STEIN: It’s not about me. that is about -- this isn't always
about -- this isn't always about Donald Trump. it's not approximately Hillary
Clinton. it is now not about my campaign. it is now not approximately Gary
Johnson. that is about the yankee electorate who deserve to have a balloting
system we are able to agree with. whilst some thing like seventy five,000 votes
in Detroit may additionally, in truth, be an errors because they are -- why
could human beings pop out in Detroit, fill in all the other positions however
now not vote for president?
WALLACE: let me --
Dr. -- Dr. Stein, let me ask you --
STEIN: that is a little bit suspicious. We need to know
what's happening due to the fact that, may want to, in truth, alternate the
outcome of the vote in Michigan.
WALLACE: inside the
1/3 presidential debate, Dr. Stein, I asked Donald Trump whether he would
receive the end result of the election and the principle of the peaceful switch
of strength. He’s what he said.
(begin VIDEO CLIP)
WALLACE: Are you
announcing you’re now not prepared now to decide to that principle?
TRUMP: What I’m announcing is that i can tell you at the
time. I’ll preserve you in suspense, good enough.
HILLARY CLINTON, D-FORMER PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE: properly,
Chris, allow me reply to that, due to the fact that’s horrifying. , each time
Donald thinks things aren't entering into his route, he claims something it's
far, is rigged in opposition to him.
(quit VIDEO CLIP)
WALLACE: Dr. Stein,
at that time, a whole lot of liberals' heads exploded because Donald Trump
would not accept the results of the election. aren't you doing precisely that
proper now? are not you doing precisely what Hillary Clinton called
"scary"?
STEIN: i'm now not right here to assist Hillary Clinton or
to explicit her point of view. in my view, the recount should have happened
within the Democratic primary as properly, in which there have been also very
suspicious outcomes, in which electorate regarded to be stripped from the rolls
in Brooklyn, wherein loads of heaps of votes went
uncounted in California. This is
not approximately helping Democrats. it is now not about assisting Republicans.
It’s not about assisting green. I -- you recognize, that is the question,
although, that the people care about.
WALLACE: I did not
ask you that. I requested you what -- I -- that’s now not the query asked you,
Dr. Stein. I requested you, why no longer take delivery of the results of the
election due to the fact what you are going is exactly what Hillary Clinton
said became frightening?
STEIN: i am no longer -- I don't care what Hillary Clinton
thinks about this and i don't care -- I care what the electorate consider this,
now not what the politicians or the pundits or the party operatives reflect
onconsideration on this. that is approximately responding to the american
electorate who're status up and pronouncing, we deserve an election system that
we will believe and this is accurate, this is relaxed in opposition to hacking,
against human blunders, in opposition to system error, and that in which the
votes are being counted, because proper now it's not clean that all the votes
are being counted. We deserve that so we will cross ahead with an election
system that we can agree with.
WALLACE: Dr. Stein --
Dr. Stein, thank you. thank you for joining us today. And we're going to stay
on pinnacle of the recount.
STEIN: thanks.
WALLACE: Up
subsequent, we're going to carry back the panel. what is next for the Democrats
after Nancy Pelosi changed into re-elected to lead her birthday celebration
inside the residence?
Plus, what do you observed? Why are Democrats sticking with
Pelosi in spite of their election losses? let me realize on facebook or Twitter
@foxnewssunday and use the #fns.
(business break)
(begin VIDEO CLIP)
REP. NANCY PELOSI, D-CALI., residence MINORITY leader: i've
a special spring in my step today because this possibility is a special one to
steer the house Democrats, carry everybody collectively as we pass ahead.
(stop VIDEO CLIP)
WALLACE:
Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi reacting to her re-election as house minority
leader after beating lower back a task from Ohio Congressman Tim Ryan.
And we're lower back now with the panel.
properly, house Democrats have had a awful run below Pelosi.
permit's take a look. After the 2008 election while Barack Obama won, they held
257 seats inside the residence. but after this election on November eighth,
they now preserve 194. it truly is a lack of 63 seats.
Juan, how do you provide an explanation for, for the reason
that record, residence Democrats setting her back as their chief?
WILLIAMS: She's a remarkable fundraiser. there is just no
doubt approximately it. And, secondly, in this surroundings where you simply
had, you understand, doubtlessly the primary girl for the presidency defeated
on the Democratic aspect, I suppose girls at the Hill have rallied to her help.
And, don't forget, a lot of the base of the celebration in Congress comes from California,
the West Coast, and the East Coast. So she's there for them. She gets -- she’ll
do it.
Tim Ryan, who turned into walking against her, as you
pointed out, from Ohio, stated he
ought to every out, do better with blue collar citizens. but in (INAUDIBLE)
report (INAUDIBLE) I assume the quality increase right here is in case you look
at Pelosi, Jim Clyburn, Steny Hoyer, those are all politicians who, as you say,
have suffered defeat after defeat and the decimation of Democrats on Capitol
Hill and additionally, with the aid of the manner, state governments around the
united states.
additionally, any other point to be made is, the people who
vote Democratic in recent times, disproportionately millennials, young humans.
They voted overwhelmingly for Hillary Clinton and but they do not see it
represented on this management, all in their 70s, and who do not appear to be
in contact with a brand new, more colourful message that, extra of that form of
energetic activism.
WALLACE: so you're
announcing they did it for antique -- the antique motives, the old style, inner
political reasons. however in terms of appealing to the us of a and the
destiny, now not so clever.
WILLIAMS: not so clever. And the question is, how do you
then get this older institution it really is ensconced and has the money, due
to the fact you are going to should rebuild the celebration. there is a
controversy now approximately who is going to run the Democratic national
Committee.
WALLACE: We’ll get to
that in a 2d.
WILLIAMS: So the query is, how do you rebuild and what's the
mess going forward? simply sitting at the sidelines as a journalist, I don't
see that these folks are the ones which you might need to entrust with that new
message.
WALLACE: So, Kim, let
me convey you into this conversation. It become clean from this election that
house Democrats do now not have a message that resonates with millions of yank
electorate, millennials, running elegance, rural. Why do you think they stored
Pelosi?
STRASSEL: I imply a part of that is Nancy Pelosi's failure,
and for all of these reasons, residence solidified her position there. At this
point, one-1/3 of all residence Democrats hail from just three states within
the united states,
the big apple, Massachusetts, and
California. absolutely everyone
that became in opposing voice in that caucus has been pushed out of the
birthday party, lost elections because of the very liberal governance of Nancy
Pelosi and Harry Reid and Barack Obama. So there aren't any voices left. Of
course they re-elected her because this is what's left of the birthday
celebration is -- believes that Nancy Pelosi is correct, despite the fact that
she’s four for 4 out there.
It turned into notable, after I listened to that Harvard
discussion board, the most awesome thing that came out of this became,
Democrats with their heads inside the sand about why they misplaced this. they
will not be honest with themselves. They accept as true with it turned into Jim
Comey, that the media changed into mean to them, they didn’t get their message
out. That’s not why they lost. They misplaced due to the fact people disagree
with their politics.
WALLACE: well,
allow's communicate approximately every other capacity face of the Democratic
birthday celebration that Juan alluded to, and that’s the front runner to be
the brand new chair of the Democratic national Committee, Congressman Keith
Ellison, the primary Muslim elected to Congress.
Monica, the Anti-Defamation League says that a speech that
Ellison made in 2010 in which he essentially said U.S.
overseas coverage run out of Israel,
they call that speech, quote, "disqualifying." So what does it say
that he may be the the front runner to be the face of the Democratic party?
CROWLEY: and
that's one difficult instance with representative Ellison. in addition, inside
the beyond, he is referred to as for a separate black nation in the usa
and he additionally has very close ties to CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic
members of the family, which a few argue can be a the front institution for the
Muslim Brotherhood. So, look, he's politically very far available at the left.
And the fact that the Democratic party is now seriously thinking about him as
its head tells you in which the birthday celebration is.
that is now not invoice Clinton’s
Democratic birthday party. this is Barack Obama’s Democratic birthday
celebration. Obama, over the past 8 years, has taken the celebration, moved it
from targeted left all of the manner to the a long way left. And it seems that
the coalition that elected him and re-elected him become specific to him. And
that with out him at the price ticket, they suffered big losses, 2010, 2014,
and now 2016. And a large part of this, which
receives to what we’ve been -- were speakme about earlier with the provider
deal and so forth, is that Democrats have overlooked, blown off, disrespected
the works magnificence. And it is not the primary time they've executed this.
those people who came out for Donald Trump, a variety of them independents and
Democrats disaffected from their very own birthday celebration because they
can’t relate to them anymore, got here out for Richard Nixon in 1968, in
‘seventy two got here out for Ronald Reagan. The old Reagan Democrats. And
unless and until this Democratic celebration leaves in the back of Barack Obama
and his doctrinaire of leftism, they are going to retain to go through those
type of electoral defeats.
BLITZER: I -- I need to stop this segment by talking about
our previous visitor, Jill Stein.
Lisa, what do you make of her recount effort? What’s this
all approximately?
LERER: nicely, appearance, Hillary Clinton's campaign did a
totally steeply-priced assessment of voting irregularities and all -- you
already know, the vote in all the states. They investigated every concept that
humans offered to them. They introduced in outside academics, technologists,
all forms of human beings and they discovered no evidence of any type of
systemic flaw within the machine, whether or not it's hacking or failed
machines or anything like that. So that is very, very, very unlikely to
alternate the results of this election. so that you need to marvel, why is Jill
Stein pursuing this so hard.
Now, of route, the integrity of our elections may be very
important, however I suppose this is ideal business for Jill Stein, despite the
fact that the money is in a separate account. She compiles a listing of
supporters that she will be able to then take. that's what third events need to
accumulate their logo.
you recognize, at the turn facet, Donald Trump is performing
very aggressively to prevent those recounts and you form of must surprise why
he is doing that as well given that it's not going to trade the outcome. you
recognize, within the words of a Disney princess, you sort of wonder why he
does not simply let it pass as it form of appears like if he’s telling --
WALLACE: Wow, a
"Frozen" reference there. it really is a primary.
LERER: yes, if he’s telling (ph) whether (ph) -- if he’s --
you know, he is creating a positive amount of smoke around it as well that I
think could make a few humans marvel whether or not there's some thing real
right here. you recognize, they will find a few type of irregularities, however
it's not going to have an impact on -- on who the president is going to be.
WILLIAMS: If I should --
(move speak)
WILLIAMS: If I ought to interject here. I suppose -- I
suppose that the reality --
LERER: yes, but he’s going to should --
WILLIAMS: The actual answer to your question might be, poll
get entry to. constructing a 3rd celebration, a green birthday celebration it's
stronger. She stated the cash is segregated now in a separate account, however
I assume that what you'll locate is that when we go beyond this, she's going to
say, you understand what, the green party’s more potent. it's miles the voice
of folks that had been Bernie Sanders supporters at the left and that we are
constructing a structure in an effort to allow us to be a a success -- and that
could be the primary time a a success third-birthday party operation in 2020.
WALLACE: Kim.
LERER: And it -- it does --
STRASSEL: appearance --
LERER: you know, he -- he can ship attorneys to reveal it,
but sending lowers to monitor it's miles one issue. Suing to forestall it
absolutely is some other, you already know?
STRASSEL: No, I suggest I think it might be crook
malpractice for Donald Trump no longer to take this distinctly severely because
of the thing (ph).
LERER: right.
STRASSEL: look, there's one reason Jill Stein’s doing there.
She changed into simply for your show for ten minutes. it really is greater
time than she's ever had on any community. So, you understand --
LERER: (INAUDIBLE).
WALLACE: In truth, we
had her at some point of the marketing campaign. In fairness, we had her
earlier than.
WILLIAMS: yes.
STRASSEL: In equity. however like this -- this is Jill
Stein's moment. She’s constructing for the subsequent presidential launch, she
says.
CROWLEY: And
it'd additionally be political malpractice no longer for Donald Trump to try to
withstand a number of this because the entire point -- humans say that the
recount is useless. The entire factor is to try and delegitimize the election.
STRASSEL: correct.
CROWLEY: I imply
Donald Trump is the clean winner. it is looking to sow seeds of doubt and
create a story that the left can dine out on for the following four years.
WILLIAMS: Oh, come on.
WALLACE: All proper,
properly --
LERER: Of course he --
WALLACE: Wow, i am
satisfied we got this plenty discussion about Jill Stein.
STRASSEL (ph): at the least there’s that.
WALLACE: And a
reference -- the simplest time that my granddaughter could have ever understood
something that become stated.
thanks, panel. See you subsequent Sunday.
Up subsequent, our "power participant of the
Week." pup love. How veterans teach therapy dogs are -- and within the
method are recuperation themselves.
(industrial damage)
WALLACE: Treating and
recovery our wound warriors is one among this nation's top obligations. And we
located a person who's give you his own way to try this. here is our
"power Play of the Week."
(start VIDEOTAPE)
RICK YOUNT, FOUNDER, WARRIOR canine CONNECTION: there may be
30,000 years or so of confirmed records at the back of the man's first-rate
friend.
hiya, precise boy.
WALLACE (voice-over): Rick Yount is the founding father of
the Warrior canine Connection, a unique software that taps into the restoration
power of dogs. Disabled veterans were getting carrier dogs for many years.
Yount decided who better to educate those puppies than different vets laid low
with put up-traumatic strain or brain injury.
YOUNT: The human-animal bond has worked higher than another
intervention that i am aware of.
WALLACE (on digicam): but, wait, better than drugs? higher
than talking?
YOUNT: yes. i was requested, how quickly does it take with a
purpose to see impact in the carrier individuals you’re running with? it's
commonly about 5 minutes.
WALLACE: (voice-over): Retired army professional Christian
Santos became injured in Afghanistan
in 2013. His nurse said schooling puppies like Cody may want to assist him.
SPC CHRISTIAN SANTOS, WARRIOR dog CONNECTION: despair,
anxiety, PTSD. i was actually like -- failed to want to socialize with different
humans. So she said, attempt the service dogs application.
UNIDENTIFIED girl: Push. top job! sure! excellent boy!
WALLACE: Yount says
in teaching the dogs, starting as dogs, the vets educate themselves that the
world is a safe location.
YOUNT: those veterans need to venture their intrusive mind.
That that dumpster door slamming changed into an IED. No, it turned into only a
dumpster door.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Oh, you're so suitable. Oh, you’re so
exact.
WALLACE: And to
reveal nice emotion. Yount recollects one tale.
YOUNT: gaining knowledge of how to praise this dog and the
persistence that I discovered in schooling this canine has absolutely taught me
how to connect to my son on a three 12 months old stage and it -- it stored my
marriage.
WALLACE: Rick Yount
became a social worker 20 years in the past whilst he delivered his canine Gabe
on a activity, driving a sobbing child to foster care. The crying stopped.
YOUNT: What I saw changed into a 4-month-antique golden
retriever doggy along with his head on this little boy's leg and he become
petting this dog.
WALLACE: Now, Yount
uses Gabe's 12-yr-antique son Huff (ph) for remedy.
YOUNT: truly given that he turned into approximately 12
weeks vintage, he commenced working with folks, and he is still doing it
nowadays.
WALLACE: At any one
time, the Warrior canine Connection has 30 vets education 65 dogs at four web
sites across the u . s .. Yount says the dogs can inform their teacher's
emotional country.
YOUNT: If the leg is bouncing, we train the puppies to come
over and lay their head on the veteran's leg. and then we -- we train the
veterans who acquire the dogs to keep the training going and puppy the canine.
So it is kind of like a self-licking ice cream cone.
WALLACE: over the
past 5 years, almost four,000 vets have helped train these puppies, and Yount
says helped heal themselves.
YOUNT: I now this has been the distinction among life and
dying with the aid of most of the veterans. There’s no question approximately
it. One Marine had took ten extraordinary medications. He could not sleep.
WALLACE (on digital camera): and then they spend time with
one of these puppies.
YOUNT: We had the canine live overnight with him. the first
night he had the dog, he had six hours instantly via.
No comments:
Post a Comment